mondogaq.blogg.se

Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2
Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2












  1. Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 how to#
  2. Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 pro#
  3. Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 software#

Please consider purchasing from one of our partners. (See System Requirements for program compatibility.) Where to Buy

Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 pro#

I tested HDR Efex Pro on a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro running Max OS X 10.6.4 with 4GB of RAM using Adobe Photoshop CS5. Like other Adobe Photoshop plug-ins in the Nik family, Nik HDR Efex Pro is compatible with a wide range of applications. Like other Nik plug-ins, HDR Efex Pro is easy to use and incorporates the company’s excellent U-Point Technology for selectively applying adjustments and effects. One of the newest plug-ins in this category is Nik Software’s HDR Efex Pro.

Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 software#

Regardless of your position on realistic versus surrealistic HDR techniques, the process is here to stay with any number of software options to help you realize your HDR goals. However, many photographers started taking HDRI to the edge, producing dramatic photographs with extreme detail and textures. Its core purpose is to expand the shadow and highlight details in order to create a more balanced exposure with, as its name implies, increased dynamic range. It will leave the sliders at the default position.HDRI (High Dynamic Range Imaging) is one of the more controversial techniques that has emerged on the photographic front. Hopefully Adobe will add more options to the Lightroom HDR function so we can tweak to our preferences.įinal Tip: If you’re not happy with how Lightroom adjusts the sliders after creating the HDR just turn off Auto Tone when creating the HDR. After that you can add more Clarity in Lightroom or export to programs like Topaz Clarity, Color Efex Pro or back to tone map in Photomatix.

Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2 how to#

How to use Lightroom 6 HDR (and Photomatix 32-bit HDR): These two methods, and maybe the Photoshop method depending on settings, are really a starting point for expanding the dynamic range. The Lightroom 6 HDR output didn’t seem to be much better than the middle exposure which is probably why people are underwhelmed. It has good shadow detail without introducing a lot of splotchy banding, halos or reverse halos (black smudges). For me the Photomatix 32-bit HDR is still the best option. In this case you see the dock has pretty good shadow detail but it doesn’t suffer from the splotchy sky of the Photomatix Contrast Optimizer version.Ĭonclusion: I have a more natural style of HDR and I try to avoid the artifacts in the over the top HDR you often see. Instead of tone mapping in Photomatix I reimport the 32-bit file to Lightroom and then adjust from there. Photomatix 32-bit HDR – This has been my go to method for awhile. It does have flaring issues shooting into the sun though. Photomatix – Contrast Optimizer (Vibrant) – It really flattens out the image and notice the exposure on the broken down dock shows more detail. Photoshop has less contrast here and also notice the difference between the sun to that of Lightroom. Photoshop has more adjustments which I believe is why it looks a bit different from the Lightroom output.

merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2

I suspect Photoshop and Lightroom are processing the same way and could give you the exact same results. If you compare this to the middle exposure above there’s really not much difference. Lightroom 6 HDR – Here we have what people are talking about. Not a bad starting point for a high dynamic range scene. Middle Exposure – I did need to bump up the exposure to match the output of the other methods. The preset I use is Highlights -100, Shadows +100, Whites +15, Blacks -15, Clarity +15 and Vibrance +15. I then applied my common starting point preset in Lightroom for HDR photos. These were all merged with what I would consider conservative settings to get a natural HDR look much like what I believe Lightroom is doing. Let’s compare the differences between the middle (correct?) exposure and a few different HDR merge methods and then I’ll tell you how to best use the function in Lightroom 6. Blah being the technical term for not the fuzzy, radioactive tone mapped tour de force that other programs employ (at least their presets). There’s a bit of controversy about this as many people consider the results to be pretty blah. Lightroom 6 is out and one of the new features is the ability to merge photos to HDR within Lightroom.














Merge to.hdr pro vs hdr efex pro 2